Saucony Freedom ISO 2 – According to many users, the Saucony Freedom ISO 2 was a well-crafted running shoe that offered an exceptional performance in a great-quality package. A lot of Saucony loyalists were pleased with the improvements made to the shoe. Overall, the majority stated the Freedom ISO 2 made their runs better, and that they genuinely enjoyed wearing the shoe.
The Saucony Freedom ISO 2 is an update to a fresh series that’s meant to provide an accommodating performance to neutral pronators. It makes use of a form-fitting design to sanction the natural movement capacity of the wearer’s foot.
ISOKNIT is the amalgamation of knitted textile and Saucony’s proprietary sock-like construction. It’s crafted to prevent skin irritation and hot spots while also bringing breathable support. A plastic support frame at the back of the shoe holds the heel and keeps it in place.
The midsole unit of the Freedom ISO 2 uses a foam compound that’s made to absorb impact shock and provide responsive cushioning. It has a contoured midfoot to support and cushion the arch, as well. A flexible rubber acts as a shield against the abrasive nature of the surfaces.
Saucony Freedom ISO 2 Running Shoes Reasons To Buy
- The upper felt much more durable compared to the previous version, a reviewer wrote.
- One user stated that the updated midsole of the Saucony Freedom ISO 2 helped keep the foot centered.
- The shoe did not cause hot spots even with extended periods of wear, a runner noticed.
- Many buyers commented that the shoe was lightweight.
- The upper was very breathable, according to several wearers.
- A lot of customers liked the design of the Freedom ISO 2.
- There was adequate traction from the outsole, a number of runners remarked.
- The shoe was extra supportive at the ankle area, said a reviewer.
- The EVERUN™ midsole was responsive and springy as expected, one runner stated.
Saucony Freedom ISO 2 Running Shoes Reasons Not To Buy
- The Freedom ISO 2 ran large in sizing, claimed a couple of wearers.
- The ride was not as stable as with the original version, a user expressed.
- One commenter noted that the shoe was not as affordable as its predecessor.
Saucony Freedom ISO 2 Sole Unit
Much like the first version – the entire point of this shoe is the sole unit. A huge block of EVERUN with an additional thin layer on the topsole to make the shoe feel more cushioned. EVERUN much like Adidas’ BOOST, Brooks’ DNA Amp, and Nike’s React material is cushioned and soft; yet firm and snappy at the same time.
Durable beyond belief and very lightweight for the amount of cushioning. Each of these materials differ slightly but the full block of EVERUN itself works very well in the Freedom. The shoe feels cushioned and soft while still being snappy and responsive.
In the first iteration of the Saucony Freedom ISO, had a full length crystallized rubber outsole which provided durability, a striking look, but maybe one of the only drawbacks of the shoe.
The full length outsole had a slight effect on flexibility and could make the shoe feel “bottom-heavy” meaning too much weight distributed to the very bottom of the shoe.
The second version counters this effect by having some grooves cut out in the crystalized rubber. This lessens the amount, increases flexibility, but does not negatively impact durability.
The Freedom ISO 2 now has a higher stack height (the shoe is physically higher off the ground) and increased weight due to additional EVERUN added to the sole.
Saucony Freedom ISO 2 Upper Info
At first glance the upper for the Freedom ISO 2 looks unchanged which is great news given that the original upper was fantastic. The ISOFIT lacing system remains comfortable, the plastic band across the heel returns, and the reflective elements which stand out all stay in the second model.
What is new however is the material used to create the upper. ISOknit, similar to any other companies full knit upper, is breathable, soft and comfortable. It creates a more breatheable upper compared to the first version, however I do not believe most runner’s who owned the original would notice the performance difference; just the aesthetics.
The second version is also slightly wider than the first so runner’s who thought the first version fit too tight will have a little more wiggle room. I do not believe that this is enough to change your sizing of the shoe, but should be on your mind when buying it if you are between half sizes and needed to size up more than usual for the first Freedom.
